Skip to content

Is the U.S. Stifling the Growth of the Cryptocurrency Industry?

Amid heightened regulatory scrutiny, burgeoning legal challenges, and a significant decline in market value, there are concerns the U.S. is intentionally stifling the growth of the crypto sector.

Table of Contents

The cryptocurrency industry in the United States is embroiled in an escalating battle for survival. Amid heightened regulatory scrutiny, the burgeoning legal challenges, and a precipitous decline in market value, insiders within the crypto industry are voicing concerns that the U.S. may be intentionally stifling the growth of the crypto sector.

Andrew Durgee, who oversees the crypto division for technology firm Republic, has voiced concerns regarding the progressively hostile environment towards digital assets such as cryptocurrencies and tokens in the U.S. Durgee's apprehension is underscored by his observation that the regulatory uncertainty surrounding this sector has increased the risk associated with investing in U.S.-based crypto firms.

Notably, a few years ago, the majority of firms in which Durgee's company invested were U.S.-based. Now, however, he estimates that only one in ten such firms will be based in the U.S., highlighting the increasing caution of investors towards the American crypto market.

Increase in Regulatory Pressure

Regulatory pressure on the crypto sector has been on the rise, driven by a series of unfortunate events that have rocked the industry. The collapse of virtual currency prices last year was followed by the meltdown of several high-profile firms, including FTX. This firm, run by the so-called "Crypto King" Sam Bankman-Fried, has been accused of conducting one of the largest financial frauds in U.S. history.

In response to these industry upheavals, U.S. regulators have been spurred into action, intensifying their oversight of the sector and initiating a string of charges against numerous crypto firms and executives. These charges span a wide array of violations, ranging from failing to properly register with authorities to more damaging allegations such as fraud and mishandling of consumer funds.

Bitcoin has been spared

Bitcoin, the largest and most widely recognized cryptocurrency, has been somewhat exempt from this current wave of regulatory scrutiny. This is largely because U.S. officials categorize Bitcoin as a commodity, akin to gold, rather than a security that would fall under the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Thus, the regulatory spotlight has instead been cast on firms issuing tokens or coins to raise capital and on the exchanges where such digital assets are bought and sold.

Regulatory Crackdown

This regulatory crackdown reached a peak this month with legal actions being taken against two of the largest platforms in the crypto space: Coinbase and Binance.

Gary Gensler, the chairman of the SEC, staunchly defended these actions, drawing parallels between the current state of the crypto industry and the financial world of the 1920s, before many of the existing rules of finance were put in place.

Repercussions of this Crackdown

The repercussions of these legal actions have been far-reaching. Customers, responding to these actions, withdrew billions of dollars from both Coinbase and Binance. Additionally, U.S. banks have curtailed their interactions with Binance, leading to the platform ceasing to accept U.S. dollars. In the wake of this uncertainty, Robinhood, a popular trading app, announced it would stop listing certain assets named in the lawsuits.

Critics of the SEC's approach have leveled accusations of the agency using "regulation by enforcement" as a tool for enhancing its own political standing. They argue that despite multiple attempts by the crypto industry to propose new regulations, the SEC has remained stubborn, refusing to recognize the differences between various types of crypto firms or the unique attributes of the technology, such as decentralized automated processing, which pose challenges to existing regulatory frameworks.

Industry insiders like Bart Stephens, managing partner of Blockchain Capital, have expressed their frustrations over what they perceive as an ongoing "regulatory attack".

Some, like Bill Hughes, senior counsel of Consensys, a software company based in Texas that utilizes crypto's blockchain technology, have gone so far as to assert that the SEC is working towards a future in which crypto does not exist in the U.S.​

SEC & the Demise of Crypto?

However, whether or not the SEC's actions could ultimately lead to the demise of the crypto industry in the U.S. — an industry in which, according to some estimates, one in every six Americans has invested — remains to be seen.

The question of the survival of the U.S. crypto industry is of significant interest, given the large portion of the American populace with a vested interest in it.

Despite the current regulatory challenges, the crypto industry's wider market value remains at about a third of what it was at its peak. Trading volumes have plummeted and developer interest is dwindling. Trust in the sector remains low, and the recent failures of some of the few traditional banks willing to engage with the crypto industry have dealt a further blow to its credibility.

The future of the crypto industry in the U.S. hangs in the balance as it continues to grapple with these regulatory hurdles. Amid the uncertainty, one thing is clear: the U.S. crypto industry is at a critical juncture, and its trajectory over the coming months and years could shape the future of finance and technology.